A Hilbert Space is a Vector Space together with an inner product which is complete for the norm given by the inner product.
Parallelogram Law:
2a+b2+2a−b2=21(∣a∣2+∣b∣2)
for all a,b∈H.
Theorem
Let K be a nonempty convex closed subset of H. For every f∈H there exists unique u∈K such that ∣f−u∣≤∣f−v∣ for all v∈K. We write u=PKf.
Proof:
Let
d=infv∈K∣f−v∣
and vn∈K a sequence such that ∣f−vn∣→d. Then,
2vn−vm2=21(∣f−vn∣2+∣f−vm∣2)−f−2vn−vm2≤21(∣f−vn∣2+∣f−vm∣2)−d2.
Thus vn is a Cauchy sequence, so limvn exists and is in K since K is closed. Uniqueness follows by the same inequality.
□
An equivalent characterization of u is the following:
Proposition 1: Let K be as in the previous theorem. Then u=PKf if and only if u∈K and
(f−u,v−u)≤0 for all v∈K.
Proof:
We compute
∣f−u∣2−∣f−v∣2=2(f,v−u)−(v,v)+(u,u)−2(u,v−u)+2(u,v−u)
=2(f−u,v−u)−∣v−u∣2.
If (f−u,v−u)≤0, then ∣f−u∣≤∣f−v∣ for all v∈K so u=Pkf. Conversely if u=PKf, then for any w∈K, replacing v=tu+(1−t)w in the above inequality yields,
2(f−u,w−u)≤(1−t)∣w−u∣2
for all t∈(0,1). Letting t→1 implies
(f−u,w−u)≤0.
□
Corollary 1: Let K be a nonempty closed convex subset of H. Then,
∣PKf1−PKf2∣≤∣f1−f2∣
for all f1,f2∈H.
Proof.
The previous proposition implies
0≥(f1−PKf1,PKf2−PKf1)+(f2−PKf2,PKf1−PKf2)
=(PKf1−PKf2,PKf1−PKf2)−(f1−f2,PKf1−PKf2).
The result follows since (f1−f2,PKf1−PKf2)≤∣f1−f2∣∣PKf1−PKf2∣ by the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality.
□
Corollary 2 Let V be a closed subspace of H and f∈H. Then u=PVf if and only if
(f−u,v)=0 for all v∈V.
Proof. Let λ∈R and v=λu, so that by Proposition 1
(λ−1)(f−u,u)≤0
for all λ∈R. It follows that (f−u,u)=0.
□
Corollary 3 If V is a closed subspace of H, then PV:H→H is a linear operator.
Proof. Let f,g∈H, λ=0, u=PVf and v=PVg. For any w∈V we have
(λf+g−(λu+v),w−(λu+v))=λ(f−u,λ−1(w−v)−u)+(g−v,(w−λu)−v)=0.
The case λ=0 is trivial. Thus, PV(λf+g)=λPV(f)+PV(g).
□